4.6 Review

Neuroimaging findings in schizotypal personality disorder: A systematic review

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.11.014

Keywords

MRI; Neuroimaging; Schizotypal personality disorder; Schizophrenia-spectrum; Schizotypy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Schizotypal personality disorder is the prototypical schizophrenia-spectrum condition, sharing similar phenomenological, cognitive, genetic, physiological, neurochemical, neuroanatomical and neuro functional abnormalities with schizophrenia. Investigations into SPD circumvent many confounds inherent to schizophrenia such as medication and institutionalization. Hence, SPD offers a unique vantage point from which to study schizophrenia-spectrum conditions. Methods: We systematically reviewed the neuroimaging literature in SPD to establish: (1) whether there are concordant findings in SPD and schizophrenia, possibly reflective of core pathology between the two conditions and (2) whether there are discordant findings in SPD and schizophrenia, possibly reflecting protective factors in the former. The findings are synthesized across structural and functional neuroimaging domains. Results: A total of 54 studies were identified. Medial temporal lobe structures seem to be compromised in both SPD and schizophrenia. In schizophrenia prefrontal structures are further compromised, whereas in SPD these seem to be larger-than-normal, possibly reflecting a compensatory mechanism. Additional pathology is discussed, including evidence of aberrant subcortical dopaminergic functioning. Conclusions: SPD is a schizophrenia-spectrum condition that shares pathology with schizophrenia, but is distinct in showing unique neural findings. Future studies are needed to confirm and localize regions of common and disparate pathology between SPD and schizophrenia. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available