4.6 Article

Association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and depression: An updated meta-analysis of 26 studies

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.06.015

Keywords

Depression; Meta-analysis; Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase; MTHFR; Polymorphism

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81172763]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Previous studies concerning the association between the 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T gene polymorphism and depression have provided inconclusive findings. A meta-analysis was therefore performed to investigate a more reliable estimate. Methods: This meta-analysis recruited 26 published studies which were selected by a search of electronic databases up to January 2013, including 4992 depression cases and 17,082 controls. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and depression susceptibility using random effect models. Results: Meta-analyses results suggested that MTHFR C677T polymorphism contributed to the increased depression risk in overall populations (for T vs. C: OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.07-1.32; for TT + CT vs. CC: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.01-1.31; for TT vs. CC: OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.16-1.75; for TT vs. CT + CC: OR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.16-1.63). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity indicated an association in Asian populations (for T vs. C: OR = 1.36, 95% CI = 1.11-1.66; for TT + CT vs. CC: OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.03-1.69; for TT vs. CC: OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.26-2.79; for TT vs. CT + CC: OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.30-2.38); and a marginal association in White populations (for TT vs. CT + CC: OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.01-1.31). However, the association between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and depression was not observed in the elderly. Conclusion: The MTHFR C677T polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of depression, especially in Asian populations. However, there was no evidence indicating a correlation in the elderly. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available