4.8 Article

High damage tolerance of electrochemically lithiated silicon

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9417

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Pittsburgh [NSF-CMMI-1300458, NSF-CMMI-1300805, NSF-CMMI-1100205, NSF-DMR-1410936, NSF-CMMI-08010934]
  2. Sandia National Lab
  3. US Department of Energy [DE-AC04-94AL85000]
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Materials Research [1410936] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  7. Directorate For Engineering [1300805, 1100205] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  9. Directorate For Engineering [1300458] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mechanical degradation and resultant capacity fade in high-capacity electrode materials critically hinder their use in high-performance rechargeable batteries. Despite tremendous efforts devoted to the study of the electro-chemo-mechanical behaviours of high-capacity electrode materials, their fracture properties and mechanisms remain largely unknown. Here we report a nanomechanical study on the damage tolerance of electrochemically lithiated silicon. Our in situ transmission electron microscopy experiments reveal a striking contrast of brittle fracture in pristine silicon versus ductile tensile deformation in fully lithiated silicon. Quantitative fracture toughness measurements by nanoindentation show a rapid brittle-to-ductile transition of fracture as the lithium-to-silicon molar ratio is increased to above 1.5. Molecular dynamics simulations elucidate the mechanistic underpinnings of the brittle-to-ductile transition governed by atomic bonding and lithiation-induced toughening. Our results reveal the high damage tolerance in amorphous lithium-rich silicon alloys and have important implications for the development of durable rechargeable batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available