4.6 Review

The neural basis of dysfunctional beliefs in non-medicated patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.11.017

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; Obsessive beliefs questionnaire; Obsessive-compulsive disorder; Voxel-based morphometry

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) [23591724]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23591724] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dysfunctional beliefs may contribute to the development and maintenance of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) according to some cognitive theories. As little has been investigated about the pathophysiology of dysfunctional beliefs in OCD, this study aimed to determine the anatomical regions that are related to OCD-related dysfunctional beliefs. We first examined 23 non-medicated patients with OCD by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and assessed their dysfunctional beliefs using the Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire-44 (OBQ-44). OBQ-44 has three factors: (1) inflated personal responsibility and the tendency to overestimate threat (OBQ-RT), (2) perfectionism and intolerance of uncertainty (OBQ-PI), and (3) over-importance and over-control of thoughts (OBQ-IC). Voxelwise analysis was used to investigate the correlation between whole brain gray matter volume and each score of OBQ-44 covarying for age, gender, education, severity, and intracranial volume. We found a significant negative correlation between gray matter volume and OBQ-IC scores in the left amygdala; there was no significant correlation with other scores. Comparison of the amygdala volume between patients with OCD and 23 matched healthy controls indicated no volume difference between groups. Taken together, the left amygdala volume may play a role in the presence of certain dysfunctional beliefs in OCD patients. (c) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available