4.6 Review

Dietary protein and protein-rich food in relation to severely depressed mood: A 10 year follow-up of a national cohort

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.11.011

Keywords

24 h recall; Diet; Depression; Food group; NHEFS; Protein

Funding

  1. National Center for Health Statistics
  2. National Institute on Aging
  3. National Cancer Institute
  4. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
  5. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  6. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  7. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
  8. National Institute of Mental Health
  9. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  10. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
  11. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  12. National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke
  13. U.S. Department of Agriculture
  14. Georgia Southern University
  15. Westat, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-protein diets are advocated to facilitate weight loss, and improve cardiovascular risk factors, but data on psychiatric effects are lacking. We analyzed data from 1947 men and 2909 women aged 25-74 years when examined in 1971-1975 as the baseline of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Follow-Up Study. The amounts of macronutrients were obtained from a 24-hour recall, and frequencies of eating protein-rich foods were estimated using a 3-month food frequency questionnaire. Severely depressed mood (SDM) was defined as Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale score 22 or taking anti-depression medication after an average of 10.6 years of follow-up. A significant gender difference was observed in the prevalence of SDM and its association with protein intake. The weighted prevalence of SDM was 11.45 (SE = 0.96) % and 17.45(1.05) % respectively among men and women. Among men, the relative risk (RRs) of SDM were 1.00, 0.46 (95% CI = 0.22-0.99) and 0.38 (0.16-0.92) respectively for the lowest, middle and highest third protein intake (p for trend = 0.0347). Among women, the RRs were 1.00, 1.93 (1.23-3.08) and 2.47 (1.24-4.90) respectively with lowest, middle and the highest third intakes (p for trend = 0.0023). These estimates were adjusted for cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption. BMI, socioeconomic status at baseline, and the history of cancer, stroke, heart attack and diabetes assessed at follow-up interview. The authors concluded that increased intake of protein demonstrated a protective effect among men but a deleterious effect among women. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available