4.6 Review

Influence of DRD2 and ANKK1 genotypes on apomorphine-induced growth hormone (GH) response in alcohol-dependent patients

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.08.024

Keywords

ANKK1; Ankyrin; Apomorphine; Dopamine DRD2 receptor; Growth hormone challenge test; Lesch's typology of alcoholism

Funding

  1. MNiSW [NN402 189335]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: D-2 receptor function can be assessed by growth hormone (GH) response to apomorphine. Several association studies between dopamine receptor polymorphisms and results of the apomorphine challenge test with normal and alcohol-dependent subjects yielded inconsistent results. In this pilot study, we tested polymorphisms from the DRD2 region for GH response to apomorphine challenge in more detail. Methods: Apomorphine challenge tests measuring GH responses on 5 time points were performed on day 1 of alcohol detoxification in 43 patients with alcohol dependence; patients were genotyped for 11 polymorphisms including DRD2, ANKK1, NCAM1 and TTC12. Results: Associations (p<0.05) were found for ANKK1 (rs11604671, rs1800497) and DRD2 (rs6276, rs1076560), which are located on adjacent chromosomal positions. Consistent with PET studies suggesting a reduced D2 receptor availability in patients carrying the ANKK1 rs1800497 T polymorphism (formerly known as DRD2 TaqI A1) we found a reduced GH response to apomorphine in those subjects. Conclusion: This has been the first study showing significant associations between apomorphine-induced GH response and SNPs in DRD2 and ANKK1 in alcohol-dependent patients. In this respect, our preliminary results are in line with other reports which suggested that DRD2 and ANKK1 polymorphisms influence D-2 receptor availability and signal transduction in the dopaminergic pathways. Small sample size in our study limits the generalizability of our results. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available