4.4 Review

Progress of biodegradable metals

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2014.08.014

Keywords

Biodegradable metals; Magnesium; Iron; Zinc; Biocompatibility

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB619102, 2012CB619100]
  2. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51225101]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31170909]
  4. NSFC/RGC Joint Research Scheme [51361165101]
  5. Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project [Z131100005213002]
  6. Project for Supervisor of Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of Beijing [20121000101]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biodegradable metals (BMs) are metals and alloys expected to corrode gradually in vivo, with an appropriate host response elicited by released corrosion products, then dissolve completely upon fulfilling the mission to assist with tissue healing with no implant residues. In the present review article, three classes of BMs have been systematically reviewed, including Mg-based. Fe-based and Zn-based BMs. Among the three BM systems, Mg-based BMs, which now have several systems reported the successful of clinical trial results, are considered the vanguards and main force. Fe-based BMs, with pure iron and Fe-Mn based alloys as the most promising, are still on the animal test stage. Zn-based BMs, supposed to have the degradation rate between the fast Mg-based BMs and the slow Fe-based BMs, are a rising star with only several reports and need much further research. The future research and development direction for the BMs are proposed, based on the clinical requirements on controllable degradation rate, prolonged mechanical stability and excellent biocompatibility, by optimization of alloy composition design, regulation on microstructure and mechanical properties, and following surface modification (C) 2014 Chinese Materials Research Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available