4.4 Article

Risk assessment and validation of flood disaster based on fuzzy mathematics

Journal

PROGRESS IN NATURAL SCIENCE-MATERIALS INTERNATIONAL
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages 1419-1425

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnsc.2008.12.010

Keywords

Flood disaster; Risk assessment; Risk validation; Fuzzy mathematics; Malaysia

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [40701172, 40671122]
  2. International Program for Cooperation in Science and Technology [2007DFA20640]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Floods often take place around rivers and plains, which indicates a higher risk of flooding in these areas. This paper adopts fuzzy comprehensive assessment (FCA), simple fuzzy classification (SFC), and the fuzzy similarity method (FSM) to assess flood disaster risk in Kelantan, Malaysia. Validation data, such as the flooded area, paddy area, urban area, residential area, and refuges, were overlaid to validate and analyze the accuracy of flood disaster risk. The results show that (1) 70-75% of flooded areas lie within the higher and highest risk zones, which shows an effective assessment accuracy; (2) paddy, built-up, and residential areas concentrated in the higher and highest risk zones are more likely to be destroyed by flood disasters; (3) 200-225 refuges in the higher and highest risk zones account for around 50% of all refuges, which means that more refuges should be built in the higher and highest risk zones to meet the accommodation requirement; (4) three methods proved to be feasible and effective in evaluating flood disaster risk, among which FCA is more suitable for the study area than the two other methods. (C) 2009 National Natural Science Foundation of China and Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier Limited and Science in China Press. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available