4.3 Review

Minimum Information about a Cardiac Electrophysiology Experiment (MICEE): Standardised reporting for model reproducibility, interoperability, and data sharing

Journal

PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 107, Issue 1, Pages 4-10

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.07.001

Keywords

Minimum Information Standard; Cardiac electrophysiology; Data sharing; Reproducibility; Integration; Computational modelling

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Science Research Council of the United Kingdom
  2. British Heart Foundation
  3. European Commission
  4. National Institutes of Health [U54HG004028, R01HL103727, R24HL085343]
  5. British Heart Foundation [PG/09/066/27898, PG/09/031/27221] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F042868/1, EP/F042868/2] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. EPSRC [EP/F042868/1, EP/F042868/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23650258, 23390042, 23300167] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiac experimental electrophysiology is in need of a well-defined Minimum Information Standard for recording, annotating, and reporting experimental data. As a step towards establishing this, we present a draft standard, called Minimum Information about a Cardiac Electrophysiology Experiment (MICEE). The ultimate goal is to develop a useful tool for cardiac electrophysiologists which facilitates and improves dissemination of the minimum information necessary for reproduction of cardiac electrophysiology research, allowing for easier comparison and utilisation of findings by others. It is hoped that this will enhance the integration of individual results into experimental, computational, and conceptual models. In its present form, this draft is intended for assessment and development by the research community. We invite the reader to join this effort, and, if deemed productive, implement the Minimum Information about a Cardiac Electrophysiology Experiment standard in their own work. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available