4.1 Article

Assay of Brain Endogenous Formaldehyde With 2, 4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine Through UV-HPLC

Journal

PROGRESS IN BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
Volume 38, Issue 12, Pages 1171-1177

Publisher

CHINESE ACAD SCIENCES, INST BIOPHYSICS
DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1206.2011.00407

Keywords

quantitative analysis; endogenous formaldehyde; high performance liquid chromatography; porcine brain; 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine; cognitive impairment

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB912303, 2012CB911004]
  2. CAS [KSCX2-YW-R-256, CAS-KSCX2-YW-R-119]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30970695]
  4. Johnson & Johnson Corporate Office of Science Technology [GJHZ1131]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic impairments of brain caused by accumulation of endogenous formaldehyde as ageing is thought as one of the risk factors for sporadic age-related dementia. Thus, it is necessary to determine the endogenous concentration of formaldehyde in brain. Using 2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (2, 4-DNPH) in the assay, the concentrations of formaldehyde in parietal lobe, frontal lobe, temporal lobe, occipital lobe, hippocampus, cerebellum and brainstem of porcine brain (n=5) were measured through UV-HPLC. Homogenizing brain tissues with 10% trichloroacetic acid (pH=1.0) not only avoided the disturbance from contaminated protein and other compounds, but also eliminated the step extraction of FA-DNPH derivative (2, 4-dinitrophenylhydrazone) and improve the methodological sensitivity (P < 0.05). The porcine brain formaldehyde was 75.5 similar to 83.4 mu mol/kg fresh brain tissues measured by this improved method. Recoveries of spiked formaldehyde at low and high level were 95.96%similar to 102.04% with relative standard deviations less than 10%. This suggests that the modified 2, 4-DNPH method is effective enough to measure the endogenous formaldehyde in brain tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available