4.8 Article

Hypomethylation of smoking-related genes is associated with future lung cancer in four prospective cohorts

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms10192

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. ERC [ERC-2008-AdG-232997]
  2. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [1050198]
  3. Roy Castle Lung Cancer Foundation
  4. MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol [MC_UU_12013_2]
  5. 'Europe Against Cancer' program of the European Commission (SANCO)
  6. German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe)
  7. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  8. German Center for Lung Research (DZL) [PB13394]
  9. Marie Curie International Incoming Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme
  10. Compagnia di San Paolo
  11. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12013/2, MC_UU_12013/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. MRC [MC_UU_12013/1, MC_UU_12013/2] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

DNA hypomethylation in certain genes is associated with tobacco exposure but it is unknown whether these methylation changes translate into increased lung cancer risk. In an epigenome-wide study of DNA from pre-diagnostic blood samples from 132 case-control pairs in the NOWAC cohort, we observe that the most significant associations with lung cancer risk are for cg05575921 in AHRR (OR for 1 s.d. = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.31-0.54, P-value = 3.3 x 10(-11)) and cg03636183 in F2RL3 (OR for 1 s.d. = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.31-0.56, P-value = 3.9 x 10(-10)), previously shown to be strongly hypomethylated in smokers. These associations remain significant after adjustment for smoking and are confirmed in additional 664 case-control pairs tightly matched for smoking from the MCCS, NSHDS and EPIC HD cohorts. The replication and mediation analyses suggest that residual confounding is unlikely to explain the observed associations and that hypomethylation of these CpG sites may mediate the effect of tobacco on lung cancer risk.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available