4.6 Article

Effect of the food-to-microorganism (F/M) ratio on the formation and size of aerobic sludge granules

Journal

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 46, Issue 12, Pages 2269-2276

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.09.007

Keywords

Aerobic granulation; F/M ratio; Activated sludge; Microbial community; Wastewater treatment

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council (RGC) of the Hong Kong SAR Government [HKU7144/E07, N_HKU 774/11]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51129803]
  3. State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control, Beijing, China [10Y02ESPCN]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Laboratory experiments were carried out to investigate the effect of the sludge loading, or the food-to-microorganism (F/M) ratio, on the rate of aerobic granulation and the size of the granules in biological wastewater treatment. Four column batch reactors were used with a similar sludge suspended solids (SS) concentration of around 2000 mg/L. The reactors were fed with a glucose-based wastewater at different chemical oxygen demand (COD) concentrations, resulting in F/M ratios from 0.3 to 1.1 g COD/g SS-d. A higher F/M ratio appeared to promote faster formation of larger granules and a lower F/M ratio led to slower formation of smaller granules. Upon complete granulation, the granules became rather stable in size, and the mean diameter of the granules in different reactors increased from 1.2 to 4.5 mm linearly with the F/M ratio applied. Molecular analysis of the sludge did not show the domination of any particular bacterial species during the granulation process. It is apparent that applying different F/M ratios in different granulation stages, e.g., a higher F/M in the early stage and a reduced F/M in the later stage, can be an effective start-up strategy to facilitate rapid granule formation and sustain small and healthy granules in bioreactors. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available