4.6 Article

Characterization of membrane foulants in a full-scale membrane bioreactor for supermarket wastewater treatment

Journal

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 1001-1009

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.01.020

Keywords

Membrane bioreactor; Membrane foulants; Membrane fouling; Supermarket oily wastewater

Funding

  1. Key Special Program on the S&T for the Pollution Control and Treatment of Water Bodies [2008ZX07316-002]
  2. Science & Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality fund [09dz1204200, 08231200200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Membrane foulants including external foulants and internal foulants were systematically characterized in a full-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) for supermarket wastewater treatment in this study. Three-dimensional excitation emission matrix (EEM) fluorescence spectroscopy, gel filtration chromatography (GFC), Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-diffusive X-ray (EDX) analyzer were used to characterize the membrane foulants. The results indicated that the organic substances with fluorescence characteristics in both external and internal foulants were identified as protein-like substances and soluble microbial by-product-like materials by EEM technology. The GFC analysis exhibited that the external foulants had much broader distributions of molecular weight (MW) than the effluent and the internal foulants. Analyses of MW distributions suggest that the external and internal foulants were formed due to distinct fouling mechanisms. Besides proteins and polysaccharides, the oil substances were identified on the fouled membranes by the FT-IR analysis. SEM and EDX analyses indicated that the foulants covering the membrane surfaces comprised not only organic substances but also inorganic elements including Mg, Ca, Na, Al, K, and Si. (c) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available