4.8 Article

Investigation of femtosecond collisional ionization rates in a solid-density aluminium plasma

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7397

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/G007187/1]
  2. Royal Society University Research Fellowship
  3. Institute for Basic Science [IBS-R012-D1-2014-a00]
  4. Czech Science Foundation [14-29772S]
  5. Czech Ministry of Education [LH14072, LG13029]
  6. Joint High Energy Density Laboratory Plasmas Program - Office of Science, Fusion Energy Sciences and the National Nuclear Security Administration, Defense Programs [DENA0001859]
  7. LCLS
  8. Stanford University through the Stanford Institute for Materials Energy Sciences (SIMES)
  9. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL)
  10. University of Hamburg through the BMBF priority programme [FSP 301]
  11. Center for Free-Electron Laser Science (CFEL)
  12. EPSRC [EP/G007187/1, EP/H035877/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  13. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G007187/1, EP/H035877/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rate at which atoms and ions within a plasma are further ionized by collisions with the free electrons is a fundamental parameter that dictates the dynamics of plasma systems at intermediate and high densities. While collision rates are well known experimentally in a few dilute systems, similar measurements for nonideal plasmas at densities approaching or exceeding those of solids remain elusive. Here we describe a spectroscopic method to study collision rates in solid-density aluminium plasmas created and diagnosed using the Linac Coherent light Source free-electron X-ray laser, tuned to specific interaction pathways around the absorption edges of ionic charge states. We estimate the rate of collisional ionization in solid-density aluminium plasmas at temperatures similar to 30 eV to be several times higher than that predicted by standard semiempirical models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available