Journal
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 282, Issue 1798, Pages -Publisher
ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1013
Keywords
molecular clock; calibration; cross-validation; fossil record; Bayesian; priors
Categories
Funding
- NERC [NE/I528250/1, NE/G009600/1]
- BBSRC [BB/G006660/1, BB/J00538X/1]
- National Science Foundation [EF-0905606]
- NESCent
- BBSRC [BB/G006660/1, BB/J00538X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- NERC [NE/G009600/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G006660/1, BB/J00538X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- Natural Environment Research Council [NE/G009600/1] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Calibration is the rate-determining step in every molecular clock analysis and, hence, considerable effort has been expended in the development of approaches to distinguish good from bad calibrations. These can be categorized into a priori evaluation of the intrinsic fossil evidence, and a posteriori evaluation of congruence through cross-validation. We contrasted these competing approaches and explored the impact of different interpretations of the fossil evidence upon Bayesian divergence time estimation. The results demonstrate that a posteriori approaches can lead to the selection of erroneous calibrations. Bayesian posterior estimates are also shown to be extremely sensitive to the probabilistic interpretation of temporal constraints. Furthermore, the effective time priors implemented within an analysis differ for individual calibrations when employed alone and in differing combination with others. This compromises the implicit assumption of all calibration consistency methods, that the impact of an individual calibration is the same when used alone or in unison with others. Thus, the most effective means of establishing the quality of fossil-based calibrations is through a priori evaluation of the intrinsic palaeontological, stratigraphic, geochronological and phylogenetic data. However, effort expended in establishing calibrations will not be rewarded unless they are implemented faithfully in divergence time analyses.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available