4.7 Article

Does polyandry control population sex ratio via regulation of a selfish gene?

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.3259

Keywords

polyandry; sexual selection; sex ratio distorter; sperm competition; meiotic drive; geographical cline

Funding

  1. NERC [NE/F003781/1, NE/I027711/1, NE/I025905/1, NE/H015604/1]
  2. Genetics Society
  3. NERC [NBAF010002, NE/H015604/1, NE/F003781/1, NE/I025905/1, NE/I027711/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NBAF010002, NE/I025905/1, NE/F003781/1, NE/H015604/1, NE/I027711/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The extent of female multiple mating (polyandry) can strongly impact on the intensity of sexual selection, sexual conflict, and the evolution of cooperation and sociality. More subtly, polyandry may protect populations against intragenomic conflicts that result from the invasion of deleterious selfish genetic elements (SGEs). SGEs commonly impair sperm production, and so are likely to be unsuccessful in sperm competition, potentially reducing their transmission in polyandrous populations. Here, we test this prediction in nature. We demonstrate a heritable latitudinal cline in the degree of polyandry in the fruitfly Drosophila pseudoobscura across the USA, with northern population females remating more frequently in both the field and the laboratory. High remating was associated with low frequency of a sex-ratio-distorting meiotic driver in natural populations. In the laboratory, polyandry directly controls the frequency of the driver by undermining its transmission. Hence we suggest that the cline in polyandry represents an important contributor to the cline in sex ratio in nature. Furthermore, as the meiotic driver causes sex ratio bias, variation in polyandry may ultimately determine population sex ratio across the USA, a dramatic impact of female mating decisions. As SGEs are ubiquitous it is likely that the reduction of intragenomic conflict by polyandry is widespread.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available