4.7 Article

Calves as social hubs: dynamics of the social network within sperm whale units

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1113

Keywords

social structure; group formation; reciprocity; network; social role; alloparental care

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society
  3. NSERC Postgraduate Scholarship (PGS-M)
  4. NSERC Canadian Graduate Scholarship (CGS-D)
  5. Killam Trust's Sir Izaak Killam Memorial Scholarship
  6. Patrick F. Lett Fund
  7. Dalhousie's Presidents Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is hypothesized that the primary function of permanent social relationships among female sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) is to provide allomothers for calves at the surface while mothers make foraging dives. In order to investigate how reciprocity of allocare within units of sperm whales facilitates group living, we constructed weighted social networks based on yearly matrices of associations (2005-2010) and correlated them across years, through changes in age and social role, to study changes in social relationships within seven sperm whale units. Pairs of association matrices from sequential years showed a greater positive correlation than expected by chance, but as the time lag increased, the correlation coefficients decreased. Over all units considered, calves had high values for all measured network statistics, while mothers had intermediate values for most of the measures, but high values for connectedness and affinity. Mothers showed sharp drops in strength and connectedness in the first year of their new calves' lives. These broad patterns appear to be consistent across units. Calves appeared to be significant nodes in the network of the social unit, and thus provide quantitative support for the theory in which communal care acts as the evolutionary force behind group formation in this species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available