4.7 Article

Urinary oxytocin and social bonding in related and unrelated wild chimpanzees

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2765

Keywords

oxytocin; social bonds; cooperation; emotional bookkeeping; grooming; chimpanzee

Funding

  1. Royal Zoological Society of Scotland
  2. British Academy
  3. Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research
  4. Leverhulme Trust
  5. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
  6. Wisconsin National Primate Research Center [NIH NCRR000167]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animals that maintain cooperative relationships show gains in longevity and offspring survival. However, little is known about the cognitive or hormonal mechanisms involved in cooperation. Indeed, there is little support for a main hypothesis that non-human animals have the cognitive capacities required for bookkeeping of cooperative exchanges. We tested an alternative hypothesis that cooperative relationships are facilitated by an endocrinological mechanism involving oxytocin, a hormone required for bonding in parental and sexual relationships across mammals. We measured urinary oxytocin after single bouts of grooming in wild chimpanzees. Oxytocin levels were higher after grooming with bond partners compared with non-bond partners or after no grooming, regardless of genetic relatedness or sexual interest. We ruled out other possible confounds, such as grooming duration, grooming direction or sampling regime issues, indicating that changes in oxytocin levels were mediated by social bond strength. Oxytocin, which is thought to act directly on neural reward and social memory systems, is likely to play a key role in keeping track of social interactions with multiple individuals over time. The evolutionary linkage of an ancestral hormonal system with complex social cognition may be the primary mechanism through which long-term cooperative relationships develop between both kin and non-kin in mammals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available