4.7 Article

The excuse principle can maintain cooperation through forgivable defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1475

Keywords

cooperation; reciprocal altruism; tit-for-tat; birds; Prisoner's Dilemma

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Latvia
  3. Science Council of Latvia
  4. Social Fund within the project 'Support for the implementation of doctoral studies at Daugavpils University' [2009/0140/1DP/1.1.2.1.2/09/IPIA/VIAA/015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reciprocal altruism describes a situation in which an organism acts in a manner that temporarily reduces its fitness while increasing another organism's fitness, but there is an ultimate fitness benefit based on an expectation that the other organism will act in a similar manner at a later time. It creates the obvious dilemma in which there is always a short-term benefit to cheating, therefore cooperating individuals must avoid being exploited by non-cooperating cheaters. This is achieved by following various decision rules, usually variants of the tit-for-tat (TFT) strategy. The strength of TFT, however, is also its weakness-mistakes in implementation or interpretation of moves, or the inability to cooperate, lead to a permanent breakdown in cooperation. We show that pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) use a TFT with an embedded 'excuse principle' to forgive the neighbours that were perceived as unable to cooperate during mobbing of predators. The excuse principle dramatically increases the stability of TFT-like behavioural strategies within the Prisoner's Dilemma game.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available