4.7 Article

Stable isotope series from elephant ivory reveal lifetime histories of a true dietary generalist

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 279, Issue 1737, Pages 2433-2441

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.2472

Keywords

C-4 grass; Kruger National Park; time series; tusks

Funding

  1. START/PACOM
  2. University of Cape Town
  3. University of KwaZulu-Natal
  4. National Research Foundation of South Africa
  5. SANParks

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Longitudinal studies have revealed how variation in resource use within consumer populations can impact their dynamics and functional significance in communities. Here, we investigate multi-decadal diet variations within individuals of a keystone megaherbivore species, the African elephant (Loxodonta africana), using serial stable isotope analysis of tusks from the Kruger National Park, South Africa. These records, representing the longest continuous diet histories documented for any extant species, reveal extensive seasonal and annual variations in isotopic-and hence dietary-niches of individuals, but little variation between them. Lack of niche distinction across individuals contrasts several recent studies, which found relatively high levels of individual niche specialization in various taxa. Our result is consistent with theory that individual mammal herbivores are nutritionally constrained to maintain broad diet niches. Individual diet specialization would also be a costly strategy for large-bodied taxa foraging over wide areas in spatio-temporally heterogeneous environments. High levels of within-individual diet variability occurred within and across seasons, and persisted despite an overall increase in inferred C-4 grass consumption through the twentieth century. We suggest that switching between C-3 browsing and C-4 grazing over extended time scales facilitates elephant survival through environmental change, and could even allow recovery of overused resources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available