4.8 Article

Structural basis for dynamic mechanism of nitrate/nitrite antiport by NarK

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8097

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) through 'Funding Program for World-Leading Innovative R&D on Science and Technology (FIRST program)'
  2. Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) Program 'The Creation of Basic Medical Technologies to Clarify and Control the Mechanisms Underlying Chronic Inflammation' of Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  3. HPCI STRATEGIC PROGRAM Computational Life Science and Application in Drug Discovery and Medical Development by MEXT
  4. MEXT [22687007, 24227004]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22687007] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NarK belongs to the nitrate/nitrite porter (NNP) family in the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) and plays a central role in nitrate uptake across the membrane in diverse organisms, including archaea, bacteria, fungi and plants. Although previous studies provided insight into the overall structure and the substrate recognition of NarK, its molecular mechanism, including the driving force for nitrate transport, remained elusive. Here we demonstrate that NarK is a nitrate/nitrite antiporter, using an in vitro reconstituted system. Furthermore, we present the high-resolution crystal structures of NarK from Escherichia coli in the nitrate-bound occluded, nitrate-bound inward-open and apo inward-open states. The integrated structural, functional and computational analyses reveal the nitrate/nitrite antiport mechanism of NarK, in which substrate recognition is coupled to the transport cycle by the concomitant movement of the transmembrane helices and the key tyrosine and arginine residues in the substrate-binding site.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available