4.7 Article

The original colours of fossil beetles

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 279, Issue 1731, Pages 1114-1121

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1677

Keywords

structural colour; taphonomy; fossil insects; epicuticle; fossil preservation

Funding

  1. IRCSET
  2. NSF [PHY-0957680]
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/I027630/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NERC [NE/I027630/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Division Of Physics
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0957680] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Structural colours, the most intense, reflective and pure colours in nature, are generated when light is scattered by complex nanostructures. Metallic structural colours are widespread among modern insects and can be preserved in their fossil counterparts, but it is unclear whether the colours have been altered during fossilization, and whether the absence of colours is always real. To resolve these issues, we investigated fossil beetles from five Cenozoic biotas. Metallic colours in these specimens are generated by an epicuticular multi-layer reflector; the fidelity of its preservation correlates with that of other key cuticular ultrastructures. Where these other ultrastructures are well preserved in non-metallic fossil specimens, we can infer that the original cuticle lacked a multi-layer reflector; its absence in the fossil is not a preservational artefact. Reconstructions of the original colours of the fossils based on the structure of the multi-layer reflector show that the preserved colours are offset systematically to longer wavelengths; this probably reflects alteration of the refractive index of the epicuticle during fossilization. These findings will allow the former presence, and original hue, of metallic structural colours to be identified in diverse fossil insects, thus providing critical evidence of the evolution of structural colour in this group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available