4.7 Article

Decomposing variation in population growth into contributions from environment and phenotypes in an age-structured population

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 279, Issue 1727, Pages 394-401

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0827

Keywords

age and sex structure; population growth; ungulates; Cervus elaphus; survival

Funding

  1. NERC
  2. NERC Centre for Population Biology
  3. NSERC
  4. NERC [NE/I024925/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/B504314/1, NE/I024925/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evaluating the relative importance of ecological drivers responsible for natural population fluctuations in size is challenging. Longitudinal studies where most individuals are monitored from birth to death and where environmental conditions are known provide a valuable resource to characterize complex ecological interactions. We used a recently developed approach to decompose the observed fluctuation in population growth of the red deer population on the Isle of Rum into contributions from climate, density and their interaction and to quantify their relative importance. We also quantified the contribution of individual covariates, including phenotypic and life-history traits, to population growth. Fluctuations in composition in age and sex classes ((st)age structure) of the population contributed substantially to the population dynamics. Density, climate, birth weight and reproductive status contributed less and approximately equally to the population growth. Our results support the contention that fluctuations in the population's (st)age structure have important consequences for population dynamics and underline the importance of including information on population composition to understand the effect of human-driven changes on population performance of long-lived species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available