4.7 Article

Trophic network structure emerges through antagonistic coevolution in temporally varying environments

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 279, Issue 1727, Pages 299-308

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2011.0826

Keywords

coevolution; tri-trophic; ecological specialization; food web structure; community ecology

Funding

  1. CSIRO
  2. NIH [5RO1 GM074265-01A2]
  3. CNRS-Region Languedoc Roussillon
  4. graduate school SIBAGHE
  5. ANR EvolStress [ANR-09-BLAN-099-01]
  6. CoMute [ANR-06-BLAN-0164-01]
  7. ANR EvoRange [ANR-09-PEXT-011]
  8. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-06-BLAN-0164] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the mechanisms underlying ecological specialization is central to our understanding of community ecology and evolution. Although theoretical work has investigated how variable environments may affect specialization in single species, little is known about how such variation impacts bipartite network structure in antagonistically coevolving systems. Here, we develop and analyse a general model of victim-enemy coevolution that explicitly includes resource and population dynamics. We investigate how temporal environmental heterogeneity affects the evolution of specialization and associated community structure. Environmental productivity influences victim investment in resistance, which will shape patterns of specialization through its regulating effect on enemy investment in infectivity. We also investigate the epidemiological consequences of environmental variability and show that enemy population density is maximized for intermediate lengths of productive seasons, which corresponds to situations where enemies can evolve higher infectivity than victims can evolve defence. We discuss our results in the light of empirical studies, and further highlight ways in which our model applies to a range of natural systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available