4.7 Article

Less is more: density influences the development of behavioural life skills in trout

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 277, Issue 1696, Pages 3035-3043

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0561

Keywords

density; foraging; anti-predator behaviour; survival; hatchery supplementation

Funding

  1. Helge Ax:son Johnson stiftelse
  2. Radman och fru Ernst Collianders stiftelse
  3. Stiftelsen Lars Hiertas Minne
  4. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
  5. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Theory suggests that habitat structure and population density profoundly influence the phenotypic development of animals. Here, we predicted that reduced rearing density and increased structural complexity promote food search ability, anti-predator response and the ability to forage on novel prey, all behavioural skills important for surviving in the wild. Brown trout were reared at three densities (conventional hatchery density, a fourth of conventional hatchery density and natural density) in tanks with or without structure. Treatment effects on behaviour were studied on trout fry and parr, whereupon 20 trout from each of the six treatment groups were released in an enclosed natural stream and recaptured after 36 days. Fry reared at natural density were faster to find prey in a maze. Moreover, parr reared at natural density were faster to eat novel prey, and showed more efficient anti-predator behaviour than fish reared at higher densities. Furthermore, parr reared at reduced densities were twice as likely to survive in the stream as trout reared at high density. In contrast, we found no clear treatment effects of structure. These novel results suggest that reduced rearing densities can facilitate the development of behavioural life skills in captive animals, thereby increasing their contribution to natural production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available