4.7 Article

Sexually antagonistic genetic variance for fitness in an ancestral and a novel environment

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 276, Issue 1664, Pages 2009-2014

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1459

Keywords

adaptation; Drosophila serrata; intersex genetic correlation; fitness; sexual conflict

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canada Research Chairs Program
  3. University of Ottawa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The intersex genetic correlation for fitness (r(w)(fm)), a standardized measure of the degree to which male and female fitness covary genetically, has consequences for important evolutionary processes, but few estimates are available and none have explored how it changes with environment. Using a half-sibling breeding design, we estimated the genetic (co) variance matrix (G) for male and female fitness, and the resulting r(w)(fm), in Drosophila serrata. Our estimates were performed in two environments: the laboratory yeast food to which the population was well adapted and a novel corn food. The major axis of genetic variation for fitness in the two environments, accounting for 51.3 per cent of the total genetic variation, was significant and revealed a strong signal of sexual antagonism, loading negatively in both environments on males but positively on females. Consequently, estimates of r(w)(fm) were negative in both environments (-0.34 and -0.73, respectively), indicating that the majority of genetic variance segregating in this population has contrasting effects on male and female fitness. The possible strengthening of the negative r(w)(fm) in this novel environment may be a consequence of no history of selection for amelioration of sexual conflict. Additional studies from a diverse range of novel environments will be needed to determine the generality of this finding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available