4.7 Article

Individual experience and evolutionary history of predation affect expression of heritable variation in fish personality and morphology

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 276, Issue 1660, Pages 1285-1293

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1555

Keywords

gene-environment interaction; plasticity; predation; personality; behavioural syndrome; additive genetic variance

Funding

  1. The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research [863.05.002]
  2. Research Council of Norway

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Predation plays a central role in evolutionary processes, but little is known about how predators affect the expression of heritable variation, restricting our ability to predict evolutionary effects of predation. We reared families of three-spined stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus from two populations-one with a history of fish predation (predator sympatric) and one without (predator naive)-and experimentally manipulated experience of predators during ontogeny. For a suite of ecologically relevant behavioural ('personality') and morphological traits, we then estimated two key variance components, additive genetic variance (V-A) and residual variance (V-R), that jointly shape narrow-sense heritability (h(2) = V-A/(V-A + V-R)). Both population and treatment differentially affected V-A versus V-R, hence h(2), but only for certain traits. The predator-naive population generally had lower V-A and h(2) values than the predator-sympatric population for personality behaviours, but not morphological traits. Values of V-R and h(2) were increased for some, but decreased for other personality traits in the predator-exposed treatment. For some personality traits, V-A and h(2) values were affected by treatment in the predator-naive population, but not in the predator-sympatric population, implying that the latter harboured less genetic variation for behavioural plasticity. Replication and experimental manipulation of predation regime are now needed to confirm that these population differences were related to variation in predator-induced selection. Cross-environment genetic correlations (r(A)) were tight for most traits, suggesting that predator-induced selection can affect the evolution of the same trait expressed in the absence of predators. The treatment effects on variance components imply that predators can affect evolution, not only by acting directly as selective agents, but also by influencing the expression of heritable variation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available