4.7 Article

Migration and stopover in a small pelagic seabird, the Manx shearwater Puffinus puffinus: insights from machine learning

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 276, Issue 1660, Pages 1215-1223

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1577

Keywords

geolocator tracking technology; tracking pelagic seabirds; Bayesian machine learning; migration; Manx shearwater; spatial ecology

Funding

  1. NERC [bas010017] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/R93261/01] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Natural Environment Research Council [bas010017] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The migratory movements of seabirds (especially smaller species) remain poorly understood, despite their role as harvesters of marine ecosystems on a global scale and their potential as indicators of ocean health. Here we report a successful attempt, using miniature archival light loggers (geolocators), to elucidate the migratory behaviour of the Manx shearwater Puffinus puffinus, a small (400 g) Northern Hemisphere breeding procellariform that undertakes a trans-equatorial, trans-Atlantic migration. We provide details of over-wintering areas, of previously unobserved marine stopover behaviour, and the long-distance movements of females during their pre-laying exodus. Using salt-water immersion data from a subset of loggers, we introduce a method of behaviour classification based on Bayesian machine learning techniques. We used both supervised and unsupervised machine learning to classify each bird's daily activity based on simple properties of the immersion data. We show that robust activity states emerge, characteristic of summer feeding, winter feeding and active migration. These can be used to classify probable behaviour throughout the annual cycle, highlighting the likely functional significance of stopovers as refuelling stages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available