4.7 Article

Balance between maternal and paternal alleles sets the timing of resource accumulation in the maize endosperm

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.1209

Keywords

endosperm; imprinting; interploidy crosses; kinship theory; maize (Zea mays); plant fertilization

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/E007252/1]
  2. BBSRC [BB/E007252/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E007252/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Key aspects of seed development in flowering plants are held to be under epigenetic control and to have evolved as a result of conflict between the interests of the male and female gametes (kinship theory). Attempts to identify the genes involved have focused on imprinted sequences, although imprinting is only one mechanism by which male or female parental alleles may be exclusively expressed immediately post-fertilization. We have studied the expression of a subset of endosperm gene classes immediately following interploidy crosses in maize and show that departure from the normal 2 : 1 ratio between female and male genomes exerts a dramatic effect on the timing of expression of some, but not all, genes investigated. Paternal genomic excess prolongs the expression of early genes and delays accumulation of reserves, while maternal genomic excess foreshortens the expression period of early genes and dramatically brings forward endosperm maturation. Our data point to a striking interdependence between the phases of endosperm development, and are consonant with previous work from maize showing progression from cell proliferation to endoreduplication is regulated by the balance between maternal and paternal genomes, and from Arabidopsis suggesting that this 'phasing' is regulated by maternally expressed imprinted genes. Our findings are discussed in context of the kinship theory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available