4.7 Article

On the mechanistic basis of fatigue crack nucleation in Ni superalloy containing inclusions using high resolution electron backscatter diffraction

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 97, Issue -, Pages 367-379

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.035

Keywords

EBSD; Fatigue crack formation; Geometrically necessary dislocations; Residual stress; Ni superalloy with inclusion

Funding

  1. Beijing Institute of Aeronautical Materials (BIAM), AVIC, China
  2. Small Equipment Grant from EPSRC, United Kingdom [EP/KO30760/1]
  3. Rolls-Royce plc.
  4. EPSRC [EP/K030760/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K503733/1, EP/K030760/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of interrupted three-point bend low-cycle fatigue tests were carried out on a powder metallurgy FHG96 nickel superalloy sample containing non-metallic inclusions. High resolution electron backscatter diffraction (HR-EBSD) was used to characterise the distribution and evolution of geometrically necessary dislocation (GND) density, residual stress and total dislocation density near a non-metallic inclusion. A systematic study of room temperature cyclic deformation is presented in which slip localisation, cyclic hardening, ratcheting and stabilisation occur, through to crack formation and microstructurally-sensitive propagation. Particular focus is brought to bear at the inclusion matrix interface. Complex inhomogeneous deformation structures were directly observed from the first few loading cycles, and these structures were found not to vary significantly with increasing number of cycles. A clear link was observed between crack nucleation site and microstructurally-sensitive growth path and the spatially-resolved sites of extreme values of residual stress and GND density. (C) 2015 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available