4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

B-vitamins and prevention of dementia

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY
Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages 75-81

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0029665108006046

Keywords

folate; vitamin B(12); homocysteine; dementia

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_U137686857] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U137686857] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [MC_U137686857] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Elevated plasma homocysteine (Hcy) concentrations have been implicated with risk of cognitive impairment and dementia, but it is unclear whether low vitamin B(12) or folate status is responsible for cognitive decline. Most studies reporting associations between cognitive function and Hey or B-vitamins have used a cross-sectional or case-control design and have been unable to exclude the possibility that such associations are a result of the disease rather than being causal. The Hey hypothesis of dementia has attracted considerable interest, as Hey can be easily lowered by folic acid and vitamin B(12), raising the prospect that B-vitamin supplementation could lower the risk of dementia. While some trials assessing effects on cognitive function have used folic acid alone, vitamin B(12) alone or a combination, few trials have included a sufficient number of participants to provide reliable evidence. An individual-patient-data meta-analysis of all randomised trials of the effects on cognitive function and vascular risk of lowering Hey with B-vitamins will maximise the power to assess the epidemiologically-predicted differences in risk. Among the twelve large randomised Hcy-lowering trials for prevention of vascular disease, data should be available on about 30000 participants with cognitive function. The principal investigators of such trials have agreed to combine individual-participant data from their trials after their separate publication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available