4.8 Article

Marginal zone CD169+ macrophages coordinate apoptotic cell-driven cellular recruitment and tolerance

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1320924111

Keywords

transplantation; autoimmunity; migration; spleen; regulation

Funding

  1. Lupus Research Institute grant
  2. National Institute of Health [AI092213, AI105500]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23390095] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tolerance to apoptotic cells is essential to prevent inflammatory pathology. Though innate responses are critical for immune suppression, our understanding of early innate immunity driven by apoptosis is lacking. Herein we report apoptotic cells induce expression of the chemokine CCL22 in splenic metallophillic macrophages, which is critical for tolerance. Systemic challenge with apoptotic cells induced rapid production of CCL22 in CD169(+) (metallophillic) macrophages, resulting in accumulation and activation of FoxP3(+) Tregs and CD11c(+) dendritic cells, an effect that could be inhibited by antagonizing CCL22-driven chemotaxis. This mechanism was essential for suppression after apoptotic cell challenge, because neutralizing CCL22 or its receptor, reducing Treg numbers, or blocking effector mechanisms abrogated splenic TGF-beta and IL-10 induction; this promoted a shift to proinflammatory cytokines associated with a failure to suppress T cells. Similarly, CCR4 inhibition blocked long-term, apoptotic cell-induced tolerance to allografts. Finally, CCR4 inhibition resulted in a systemic breakdown of tolerance to self after apoptotic cell injection with rapid increases in anti-dsDNA IgG and immune complex deposition. Thus, the data demonstrate CCL22-dependent chemotaxis is a key early innate response required for apoptotic cell-induced suppression, implicating a previously unknown mechanism of macrophage-dependent coordination of early events leading to stable tolerance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available