4.8 Article

Sulfenome mining in Arabidopsis thaliana

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1411607111

Keywords

oxidative stress; redox regulation; cysteine oxidation

Funding

  1. Ghent University Multidisciplinary Research Partnership [01MRB 510W]
  2. Bijzondere Onderzoeksfonds [BOF 01J11311]
  3. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Program [IUAP VII/29]
  4. Belgian State, Science Policy Office
  5. Research Foundation-Flanders [G.0D.79.14N, G.0038.09N]
  6. European Cooperation in Science and Research (COST Action) [BM1203/EU-ROS]
  7. VIB International PhD Program predoctoral fellowship
  8. Erasmus Mundus External Cooperation Window predoctoral fellowship
  9. Omics@vib Marie Curie COFUND fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been shown to be potent signaling molecules. Today, oxidation of cysteine residues is a well-recognized posttranslational protein modification, but the signaling processes steered by such oxidations are poorly understood. To gain insight into the cysteine thiol-dependent ROS signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana, we identified the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-dependent sulfenome: that is, proteins with at least one cysteine thiol oxidized to a sulfenic acid. By means of a genetic construct consisting of a fusion between the C-terminal domain of the yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) AP-1-like (YAP1) transcription factor and a tandem affinity purification tag, we detected similar to 100 sulfenylated proteins in Arabidopsis cell suspensions exposed to H2O2 stress. The in vivo YAP1-based trapping of sulfenylated proteins was validated by a targeted in vitro analysis of DEHYDROASCORBATE REDUCTASE2 (DHAR2). In DHAR2, the active site nucleophilic cysteine is regulated through a sulfenic acid-dependent switch, leading to S-glutathionylation, a protein modification that protects the protein against oxidative damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available