4.8 Article

Arhgap36-dependent activation of Gli transcription factors

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1322362111

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute [R01 CA136574, U01 CA172687]
  2. NIH Director's Pioneer Award [DP1 HD075622]
  3. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  4. Stanford Center for Children's Brain Tumors
  5. Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation Young Investigator Award
  6. Beirne Faculty Scholar Endowment
  7. German Cancer Aid [109252, 108456]
  8. Federal Ministry of Education and Research through International Cancer Gene Consortium PedBrain and National Genome Research Network-Plus [01GS0883]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hedgehog (Hh) pathway activation and Gli-dependent transcription play critical roles in embryonic patterning, tissue homeostasis, and tumorigenesis. By conducting a genome-scale cDNA overexpression screen, we have identified the Rho GAP family member Arhgap36 as a positive regulator of the Hh pathway in vitro and in vivo. Arhgap36 acts in a Smoothened (Smo)-independent manner to inhibit Gli repressor formation and to promote the activation of full-length Gli proteins. Arhgap36 concurrently induces the accumulation of Gli proteins in the primary cilium, and its ability to induce Gli-dependent transcription requires kinesin family member 3a and intraflagellar transport protein 88, proteins that are essential for ciliogenesis. Arhgap36 also functionally and biochemically interacts with Suppressor of Fused. Transcriptional profiling further reveals that Arhgap36 is overexpressed in murine medulloblastomas that acquire resistance to chemical Smo inhibitors and that ARHGAP36 isoforms capable of Gli activation are upregulated in a subset of human medulloblastomas. Our findings reveal a new mechanism of Gli transcription factor activation and implicate ARHGAP36 dysregulation in the onset and/or progression of GLI-dependent cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available