4.8 Article

Team science for science communication

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1320021111

Keywords

collaboration; informed decision-making

Funding

  1. Rockefeller Foundation
  2. National Science Foundation's Center for Climate and Energy Decision-Making [NSF 09-554]
  3. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0949710] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carnegie Mellon University collaborated to develop science communications aimed at presenting personalized coastal flood risk information to the public. We encountered four main challenges: agreeing on goals; balancing complexity and simplicity; relying on data, not intuition; and negotiating external pressures. Each challenge demanded its own approach. We navigated agreement on goals through intensive internal communication early on in the project. We balanced complexity and simplicity through evaluation of communication materials for user understanding and scientific content. Early user test results that overturned some of our intuitions strengthened our commitment to testing communication elements whenever possible. Finally, we did our best to negotiate external pressures through regular internal communication and willingness to compromise.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available