4.8 Article

Increased enzyme binding to substrate is not necessary for more efficient cellulose hydrolysis

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213426110

Keywords

biofuels; kinetic modeling; lignocellulose; polysaccharide hydrolysis; glycosidases

Funding

  1. National Advanced Biofuels Consortium (NABC)
  2. Center for Nonlinear Studies, and the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD)
  3. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)
  4. US Department of Energy, Office of Science
  5. Office of Biological and Environmental Research through Cooperative Agreement [DE-FC02-07ER64494]
  6. University of Wisconsin System
  7. US Department of Energy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Substrate binding is typically one of the rate-limiting steps preceding enzyme catalytic action during homogeneous reactions. However, interfacial-based enzyme catalysis on insoluble crystalline substrates, like cellulose, has additional bottlenecks of individual biopolymer chain decrystallization from the substrate interface followed by its processive depolymerization to soluble sugars. This additional decrystallization step has ramifications on the role of enzyme-substrate binding and its relationship to overall catalytic efficiency. We found that altering the crystalline structure of cellulose from its native allomorph I-beta to IIII results in 40-50% lower binding partition coefficient for fungal cellulases, but surprisingly, it enhanced hydrolytic activity on the latter allomorph. We developed a comprehensive kinetic model for processive cellulases acting on insoluble substrates to explain this anomalous finding. Our model predicts that a reduction in the effective binding affinity to the substrate coupled with an increase in the decrystallization procession rate of individual cellulose chains from the substrate surface into the enzyme active site can reproduce our anomalous experimental findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available