4.8 Article

Protein-DNA complexes are the primary sources of replication fork pausing in Escherichia coli

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1303890110

Keywords

DNA repair; genome stability; Rep; RNA polymerase; recombination

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G005915/1, BB/I001859/1]
  2. National Institutes of Health [GM34557]
  3. Medical Research Council [G0800970]
  4. BBSRC [BB/G005915/1, BB/I001859/1, BB/I001859/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. MRC [G0800970] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G005915/1, BB/I001859/2, BB/I001859/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0800970] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Replication fork pausing drives genome instability, because any loss of paused replisome activity creates a requirement for reloading of the replication machinery, a potentially mutagenic process. Despite this importance, the relative contributions to fork pausing of different replicative barriers remain unknown. We show here that Deinococcus radiodurans RecD2 helicase inactivates Escherichia coli replisomes that are paused but still functional in vitro, preventing continued fork movement upon barrier removal or bypass, but does not inactivate elongating forks. Using RecD2 to probe replisome pausing in vivo, we demonstrate that most pausing events do not lead to replisome inactivation, that transcription complexes are the primary sources of this pausing, and that an accessory replicative helicase is critical for minimizing the frequency and/or duration of replisome pauses. These findings reveal the hidden potential for replisome inactivation, and hence genome instability, inside cells. They also demonstrate that efficient chromosome duplication requires mechanisms that aid resumption of replication by paused replisomes, especially those halted by protein-DNA barriers such as transcription complexes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available