4.8 Article

Paradoxical role of the proto-oncogene Axl and Mer receptor tyrosine kinases in colon cancer

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1302507110

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI089824, CA95060, T32 AI007019]
  2. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation
  3. Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center
  4. National Science Foundation [DGE-1122492]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The receptor tyrosine kinases Axl and Mer, belonging to the Tyro3, Axl and Mer (TAM) receptor family, are expressed in a number of tumor cells and have well-characterized oncogenic roles. The therapeutic targeting of these kinases is considered an anticancer strategy, and various inhibitors are currently under development. At the same time, Axl and Mer are expressed in dendritic cells and macrophages and have an essential function in limiting inflammation. Inflammation is an enabling characteristic of multiple cancer hallmarks. These contrasting oncogenic and anti-inflammatory functions of Axl and Mer posit a potential paradox in terms of anticancer therapy. Here we demonstrate that azoxymethane (AOM) and dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced inflammation-associated cancer is exacerbated in mice lacking Axl and Mer. Ablation of Axl and Mer signaling is associated with increased production of proinflammatory cytokines and failure to clear apoptotic neutrophils in the intestinal lamina propria, thereby favoring a tumor-promoting environment. Interestingly, loss of these genes in the hematopoietic compartment is not associated with increased colitis. Axl and Mer are expressed in radioresistant intestinal macrophages, and the loss of these genes is associated with an increased inflammatory signature in this compartment. Our results raise the possibility of potential adverse effects of systemic anticancer therapies with Axl and Mer inhibitors, and underscore the importance of understanding their tissue and cell type-specific functions in cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available