4.8 Article

Simulating the pulling of stalled elongated peptide from the ribosome by the translocon

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1307869110

Keywords

arrest peptide; coarse grained model; empirical valence bond; Langevin dynamics; secM

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM40283, GM02449]
  2. Direct For Biological Sciences
  3. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [0836400] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1243719] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nature of the coupling between the stalling of the elongated nascent peptide chain in the ribosome and its insertion through the translocon is analyzed, focusing on the recently discovered biphasic force that overcomes the stalling barrier. The origin of this long-range coupling is explored by coarse-grained simulations that combine the translocon (TR) insertion profile and the effective chemical barrier for the extension of the nascent chain in the ribosome. Our simulation determined that the inserted H segment is unlikely to climb the TR barrier in parallel with the peptide synthesis chemical step and that the nascent chain should first overcome the chemical barriers and move into the ribosome-TR gap region before the insertion into the TR tunnel. Furthermore, the simulations indicate that the coupled TR-chemistry free energy profile accounts for the biphasic force. Apparently, although the overall elongation/insertion process can be depicted as a tug-of-war between the forces of the TR and the ribosome, it is actually a reflection of the combined free-energy landscape. Most importantly, the present study helps to relate the experimental observation of the biphasic force to crucial information about the elusive path and barriers of the TR insertion process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available