4.8 Article

Molecular architecture of the 26S proteasome holocomplex determined by an integrative approach

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1120559109

Keywords

coiled coils; mass spectrometry; proteasome-COP9-eIF3 domain; proteasome-cyclosome repeats

Funding

  1. European Union [HEALTH-F4-2008-201648]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 594]
  3. Human Frontier Science Project (Career Development Award)
  4. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM54762, U54 RR022220, R01 GM083960]
  5. Clore Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 26S proteasome is at the executive end of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway for the controlled degradation of intracellular proteins. While the structure of its 20S core particle (CP) has been determined by X-ray crystallography, the structure of the 19S regulatory particle (RP), which recruits substrates, unfolds them, and translocates them to the CP for degradation, has remained elusive. Here, we describe the molecular architecture of the 26S holocomplex determined by an integrative approach based on data from cryoelectron microscopy, X-ray crystallography, residue-specific chemical cross-linking, and several proteomics techniques. The lid of the RP (consisting of Rpn3/5/6/7/8/9/11/12) is organized in a modular fashion. Rpn3/5/6/7/9/12 form a horseshoe-shaped heterohexamer, which connects to the CP and roofs the AAA-ATPase module, positioning the Rpn8/Rpn11 heterodimer close to its mouth. Rpn2 is rigid, supporting the lid, while Rpn1 is conformationally variable, positioned at the periphery of the ATPase ring. The ubiquitin receptors Rpn10 and Rpn13 are located in the distal part of the RP, indicating that they were recruited to the complex late in its evolution. The modular structure of the 26S proteasome provides insights into the sequence of events prior to the degradation of ubiquitylated substrates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available