4.8 Article

Conditionally reprogrammed cells represent a stem-like state of adult epithelial cells

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1213241109

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute
  2. National Disease Research Interchange
  3. National Institutes of Health Grant [5 U42 RR006042, R01-OD11168]
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute through the Precollege and Undergraduate Science Education Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combination of irradiated fibroblast feeder cells and Rho kinase inhibitor, Y-27632, conditionally induces an indefinite proliferative state in primary mammalian epithelial cells. These conditionally reprogrammed cells (CRCs) are karyotype-stable and nontumorigenic. Because self-renewal is a recognized property of stem cells, we investigated whether Y-27632 and feeder cells induced a stem-like phenotype. We found that CRCs share characteristics of adult stem cells and exhibit up-regulated expression of alpha 6 and beta 1 integrins, Delta Np63 alpha, CD44, and telomerase reverse transcriptase, as well as decreased Notch signaling and an increased level of nuclear beta-catenin. The induction of CRCs is rapid (occurs within 2 d) and results from reprogramming of the entire cell population rather than the selection of a minor subpopulation. CRCs do not overexpress the transcription factor sets characteristic of embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells (e.g., Sox2, Oct4, Nanog, or Klf4). The induction of CRCs is also reversible, and removal of Y-27632 and feeders allows the cells to differentiate normally. Thus, when CRCs from ectocervical epithelium or tracheal epithelium are placed in an air-liquid interface culture system, the cervical cells form a well differentiated stratified squamous epithelium, whereas the tracheal cells form a ciliated airway epithelium. We discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities afforded by a method that can generate adult stem-like cells in vitro without genetic manipulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available