4.8 Article

Phenotype-based high-content chemical library screening identifies statins as inhibitors of in vivo lymphangiogenesis

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1206036109

Keywords

high-content screening; small compound screening; lymphatic endothelium; chemical genetics

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health Grant [CA69184, EY017392]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [3100A0-108207, 31003A-130627, 205321-134783]
  3. European Communities [LSHC-CT-2005-518178]
  4. European Research Council [LYVICAM]
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [FOR1406, TP4]
  6. Oncosuisse
  7. Krebsliga Zurich

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lymphangiogenesis plays an important role in promoting cancer metastasis to sentinel lymph nodes and beyond and also promotes organ transplant rejection. We used human lymphatic endothelial cells to establish a reliable three-dimensional lymphangiogenic sprouting assay with automated image acquisition and analysis for inhibitor screening. This high-content phenotype-based assay quantifies sprouts by automated fluorescence microscopy and newly developed analysis software. We identified signaling pathways involved in lymphangiogenic sprouting by screening the Library of Pharmacologically Active Compounds (LOPAC)(1280) collection of pharmacologically relevant compounds. Hit characterization revealed that mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) 1/2 inhibitors substantially block lymphangiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, the drug class of statins, for the first time, emerged as potent inhibitors of lymphangiogenic sprouting in vitro and of corneal and cutaneous lymphangiogenesis in vivo. This effect was mediated by inhibition of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase and subsequently the isoprenylation of Rac1. Supplementation with the enzymatic products of HMG-CoA reductase functionally rescued lymphangiogenic sprouting and the recruitment of Rac1 to the plasma membrane.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available