4.8 Article

Tolerance to apoptotic cells is regulated by indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1117736109

Keywords

inflammation; macrophage

Funding

  1. Lupus Research Institute
  2. National Institutes of Health [AI092213, AI063402, AI075165, CA103320, CA096651, CA112431]
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Swedish Medical Society
  5. King Gustaf V's 80-Years Foundation
  6. Swedish Rheumatism Association
  7. Swedish Heart/Lung Foundation
  8. Torsten Soderberg Foundation
  9. Karolinska Institutet
  10. NewLink Genetics
  11. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23390095] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tolerance to self-antigens present in apoptotic cells is critical to maintain immune-homeostasis and prevent systemic autoimmunity. However, mechanisms that sustain self-tolerance are poorly understood. Here we show that systemic administration of apoptotic cells to mice induced splenic expression of the tryptophan catabolizing enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO). IDO expression was confined to the splenic marginal zone and was abrogated by depletion of CD169(+) cells. Pharmacologic inhibition of IDO skewed the immune response to apoptotic cells, resulting in increased proinflammatory cytokine production and increased effector T-cell responses toward apoptotic cell-associated antigens. Presymptomatic lupus-prone MRLlpr/lpr mice exhibited abnormal elevated IDO expression in the marginal zone and red pulp and inhibition of IDO markedly accelerated disease progression. Moreover, chronic exposure of IDO-deficient mice to apoptotic cells induced a lupus-like disease with serum autoreactivity to double-stranded DNA associated with renal pathology and increased mortality. Thus, IDO limits innate and adaptive immunity to apoptotic self-antigens and IDO-mediated regulation inhibits inflammatory pathology caused by systemic autoimmune disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available