4.1 Article

Climate change factors and Aspergillus flavus: effects on gene expression, growth and aflatoxin production

Journal

WORLD MYCOTOXIN JOURNAL
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 171-179

Publisher

WAGENINGEN ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3920/WMJ2014.1726

Keywords

Aspergillus flavus; growth; aflatoxin B-1; temperature; water stress elevated CO2; climate change

Funding

  1. Egyptian Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objectives of this study were to obtain scientific data on the impact that interactions between water stress (water activity (a(w)); 0.97, 0.95, 0.92), temperature (34, 37 degrees C) and CO2 exposure (350, 650, 1000 ppm) may have on the growth, gene expression of biosynthetic genes (aflD, aflR), and phenotypic aflatoxin B-1 (AFB(1)) production by a type strain of Aspergillus flavus on a conducive medium. The study showed that while aw, affected growth there was no statistically significant effect of temperature or CO2 exposure. The effect of these interacting factors on aflD and aflR gene expression showed that at 34 degrees C there was maximum relative expression of aflD under the control conditions (34 degrees C, 350 ppm) with a decrease in expression with elevated CO2 and water stress. For aflR expression at 34 degrees C, there was a significant increase in expression, but only at 0.92 am, and 650 ppm CO2. However, at 37 degrees C, there was a significant increase in expression of both aflD and aflR at 0.95 and 0.92 aw and 650 and 1000 ppm CO2. There was an associated increase in AFB(1) in these treatments. In contrast, at 34 degrees C there were no significant differences for interacting treatments. This is the first study to examine these three-way interacting climatic factors on growth and mycotoxin production by a strain of A. flavus. This provides data that are necessary to help predict the real impacts of climate change on mycotoxigenic fungi.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available