4.8 Article

Unifying the spatial epidemiology and molecular evolution of emerging epidemics

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1206598109

Keywords

phylogeny; phylogeography; transmission

Funding

  1. Royal Society
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM086887]
  3. Centers for Disease Control/National Center for Infectious Diseases [R01-CI-000214]
  4. UK Medical Research Council
  5. European Research Council Seventh Framework Programme [260864]
  6. Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore
  7. Medical Research Council [G1002297] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [G1002297] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce a conceptual bridge between the previously unlinked fields of phylogenetics and mathematical spatial ecology, which enables the spatial parameters of an emerging epidemic to be directly estimated from sampled pathogen genome sequences. By using phylogenetic history to correct for spatial autocorrelation, we illustrate how a fundamental spatial variable, the diffusion coefficient, can be estimated using robust nonparametric statistics, and how heterogeneity in dispersal can be readily quantified. We apply this framework to the spread of the West Nile virus across North America, an important recent instance of spatial invasion by an emerging infectious disease. We demonstrate that the dispersal of West Nile virus is greater and far more variable than previously measured, such that its dissemination was critically determined by rare, long-range movements that are unlikely to be discerned during field observations. Our results indicate that, by ignoring this heterogeneity, previous models of the epidemic have substantially overestimated its basic reproductive number. More generally, our approach demonstrates that easily obtainable genetic data can be used to measure the spatial dynamics of natural populations that are otherwise difficult or costly to quantify.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available