4.8 Article

Accurate protein structure modeling using sparse NMR data and homologous structure information

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1202485109

Keywords

biochemistry; biophysics; computational biology; nuclear magnetic resonance; structural genomics

Funding

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1R01-GM092802-01]
  3. NIH PSI-Biology Grant [U54-GM094597]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While information from homologous structures plays a central role in X-ray structure determination by molecular replacement, such information is rarely used in NMR structure determination because it can be incorrect, both locally and globally, when evolutionary relationships are inferred incorrectly or there has been considerable evolutionary structural divergence. Here we describe a method that allows robust modeling of protein structures of up to 225 residues by combining H-1(N), C-13, and N-15 backbone and C-13 beta chemical shift data, distance restraints derived from homologous structures, and a physically realistic all-atom energy function. Accurate models are distinguished from inaccurate models generated using incorrect sequence alignments by requiring that (i) the all-atom energies of models generated using the restraints are lower than models generated in unrestrained calculations and (ii) the low-energy structures converge to within 2.0 angstrom backbone rmsd over 75% of the protein. Benchmark calculations on known structures and blind targets show that the method can accurately model protein structures, even with very remote homology information, to a backbone rmsd of 1.2-1.9 angstrom relative to the conventional determined NMR ensembles and of 0.9-1.6 angstrom relative to X-ray structures for well-defined regions of the protein structures. This approach facilitates the accurate modeling of protein structures using backbone chemical shift data without need for side-chain resonance assignments and extensive analysis of NOESY cross-peak assignments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available