4.8 Article

Foraging success of biological Levy flights recorded in situ

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1121201109

Keywords

optimal foraging; organism; predator-prey; telemetry; evolution

Funding

  1. United Kingdom Natural Environment Research Council
  2. Marine Biological Association
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [SFRH/BPD/70070/2010]
  4. IPEV [109]
  5. NERC [mba010004] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [mba010004] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is an open question how animals find food in dynamic natural environments where they possess little or no knowledge of where resources are located. Foraging theory predicts that in environments with sparsely distributed target resources, where forager knowledge about resources' locations is incomplete, Levy flight movements optimize the success of random searches. However, the putative success of Levy foraging has been demonstrated only in model simulations. Here, we use high-temporal-resolution Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking of wandering (Diomedea exulans) and black-browed albatrosses (Thalassarche melanophrys) with simultaneous recording of prey captures, to show that both species exhibit Levy and Brownian movement patterns. We find that total prey masses captured by wandering albatrosses during Levy movements exceed daily energy requirements by nearly fourfold, and approached yields by Brownian movements in other habitats. These results, together with our reanalysis of previously published albatross data, overturn the notion that albatrosses do not exhibit Levy patterns during foraging, and demonstrate that Levy flights of predators in dynamic natural environments present a beneficial alternative strategy to simple, spatially intensive behaviors. Our findings add support to the possibility that biological Levy flight may have naturally evolved as a search strategy in response to sparse resources and scant information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available