4.8 Article

Variation in personality and fitness in wild female baboons

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1210780109

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. Leakey Foundation
  4. National Geographic Society
  5. University of Pennsylvania

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies of personality in nonhuman primates have usually relied on assessments by humans and seldom considered the function of the resulting trait classifications. In contrast, we applied exploratory principal component analysis to seven behaviors among 45 wild female baboons over 7 y to determine whether the personality dimensions that emerged were associated with measures of reproductive success. We identified three relatively stable personality dimensions, each characterized by a distinct suite of behaviors that were not redundant with dominance rank or the availability of kin. Females scoring high on the Nice dimension were friendly to all females and often grunted to lower-ranking females to signal benign intent. Aloof females were aggressive, less friendly, and grunted primarily to higher-ranking females. Loner females were often alone, relatively unfriendly, and also grunted most often to higher-ranking females. Aloof and Loner females were rarely approached by others. Personality dimensions were correlated in different ways with three measures previously shown to be associated with fitness: stress levels and two behavioral indices reflecting the closeness of dyadic bonds formed by individuals. Females who scored high on Nice had high composite sociality indices (CSI) and stable partner preferences, whereas females who scored high on Aloof had lower CSI scores but significantly more stable partner preferences. Loner females had significantly lower CSI scores, less stable partner preferences, and significantly higher glucocorticoid levels. It remains to be determined which of the Nice or Aloof personality dimensions is more adaptive, or whether variation is maintained by contrasting effects on fitness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available