4.8 Article

Anti-amyloid therapy protects against retinal pigmented epithelium damage and vision loss in a model of age-related macular degeneration

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1100901108

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Pfizer Inc.
  2. National Institutes of Health [R24 EY017404, R01 EY019038, P30 EY005722]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.
  4. Core Grants to the Duke Eye Center
  5. RPB Special Scholars Award
  6. Ruth and Milton Steinbach Fund
  7. Macular Vision Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a leading cause of visual dysfunction worldwide. Amyloid beta (A beta) peptides, A beta 1-40 (A beta 40) and A beta 1-42 (A beta 42), have been implicated previously in the AMD disease process. Consistent with a pathogenic role for A beta, we show here that a mouse model of AMD that invokes multiple factors that are known to modify AMD risk (aged human apolipoprotein E 4 targeted replacement mice on a high-fat, cholesterol-enriched diet) presents with A beta-containing deposits basal to the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE), histopathologic changes in the RPE, and a deficit in scotopic electroretinographic response, which is reflective of impaired visual function. Strikingly, these electroretinographic deficits are abrogated in a dose-dependent manner by systemic administration of an antibody targeting the C termini of A beta 40 and A beta 42. Concomitant reduction in the levels of A beta and activated complement components in sub-RPE deposits and structural preservation of the RPE are associated with anti-A beta 40/42 antibody immunotherapy and visual protection. These observations are consistent with the reduction in amyloid plaques and improvement of cognitive function in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease treated with anti-A beta antibodies. They also implicate A beta in the pathogenesis of AMD and identify A beta as a viable therapeutic target for its treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available