4.8 Article

Sex difference in the near-24-hour intrinsic period of the human circadian timing system

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1010666108

Keywords

biological rhythm; gender; phase angle

Funding

  1. Respironics
  2. Actelion, Ltd.
  3. Bombardier, Inc.
  4. Boston Celtics
  5. Cephalon, Inc.
  6. Delta Airlines
  7. Eli Lilly and Co.
  8. Garda Siochana Inspectorate
  9. Global Ground Support
  10. Johnson Johnson
  11. Koninklijke Philips Electronics, NV
  12. Minnesota Timberwolves
  13. Portland Trail Blazers
  14. Philips Respironics, Inc.
  15. Sanofi-Aventis, Inc.
  16. Sepracor, Inc.
  17. Sleep Multimedia, Inc.
  18. Somnus Therapeutics, Inc.
  19. Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  20. Zeo, Inc.
  21. McGraw-Hill
  22. Massachusetts Medical Society/New England Journal of Medicine
  23. New York Times
  24. Penguin Press
  25. Philips Respironics
  26. Alliance for Epilepsy Research
  27. American Academy of Sleep Medicine
  28. Duke University School of Medicine
  29. Mount Sinai School of Medicine
  30. National Academy of Sciences
  31. North East Sleep Society
  32. Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology
  33. St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital
  34. University of Virginia Medical Center
  35. University of Washington Medical Center
  36. University of Wisconsin Medical School
  37. New England College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
  38. ResMed
  39. Brigham and Women's Hospital
  40. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  41. George H. Kidder, Esq.
  42. Gerald McGinnis
  43. GlaxoSmithKline
  44. Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  45. Lilly USA
  46. Merck Co., Inc.
  47. Pfizer
  48. Praxair US Homecare
  49. Respironics, Inc.
  50. Select Comfort Corporation
  51. Sleep Health Centers, LLC
  52. Somaxon Pharmaceuticals
  53. Takeda Pharmaceuticals
  54. Tempur-Pedic
  55. Watermark Medical
  56. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [P01 AG09975, R01 HL080978, R01 HL52992, R21 AT02571, U01 AG12642, T32 HL07901, M01 RR02635, UL1 RR025758]
  57. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NAS9-19435, NAG 5-3952]
  58. National Space Biomedical Research Institute [NCC9-58]
  59. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [F49620-94-1-0398, F49620-95-1-0388, F49620-00-1-0266]
  60. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  61. Harvard University and its affiliated academic health care centers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The circadian rhythms of melatonin and body temperature are set to an earlier hour in women than in men, even when the women and men maintain nearly identical and consistent bedtimes and wake times. Moreover, women tend to wake up earlier than men and exhibit a greater preference for morning activities than men. Although the neurobiological mechanism underlying this sex difference in circadian alignment is unknown, multiple studies in nonhuman animals have demonstrated a sex difference in circadian period that could account for such a difference in circadian alignment between women and men. Whether a sex difference in intrinsic circadian period in humans underlies the difference in circadian alignment between men and women is unknown. We analyzed precise estimates of intrinsic circadian period collected from 157 individuals (52 women, 105 men; aged 18-74 y) studied in a month-long inpatient protocol designed to minimize confounding influences on circadian period estimation. Overall, the average intrinsic period of the melatonin and temperature rhythms in this population was very close to 24 h [24.15 +/- 0.2 h (24 h 9 min +/- 12 min)]. We further found that the intrinsic circadian period was significantly shorter in women [24.09 +/- 0.2 h (24 h 5 min +/- 12 min)] than in men [24.19 +/- 0.2 h (24 h 11 min +/- 12 min); P < 0.01] and that a significantly greater proportion of women have intrinsic circadian periods shorter than 24.0 h (35% vs. 14%; P < 0.01). The shorter average intrinsic circadian period observed in women may have implications for understanding sex differences in habitual sleep duration and insomnia prevalence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available